Renewable Vs Nuclear: The Fate Of Green Energy In Belarus

Renewable Vs Nuclear: The Fate Of Green Energy In Belarus

Lizaveta Kasmach

Farming the wind

Construction of wind turbines in Navahrudak district. Source:

Belarusian society has swallowed the nuclear power pill, despite the trauma of Chernobyl, since the state began marketing it as the single best way to secure the country's energy independence. However, the new nuclear power plantas an energy independence project does not eliminate Russian dominance in the Belarusian energy sector. Development of renewable energy in this respect looks more promising in terms of diversifying energy production.

Wind energy came to Belarus in 2000 with the construction of two wind turbines in Miadzel district. Currently, the largest Belarusian wind farm has only 11 wind turbines. It started operating inNavahrudak district in spring 2016. Each of the wind turbines has an average capacity of 1 MW – enough to supply energy to about 500 households.

The hilly landscape of the Navahrudak region makes it one of the most suitable areas in Belarus for the development of wind energy. According to estimates of energy sector specialists, renewable energy sources here have the potential to produce up to 24m kWh per year – enough to cover about 25 per cent of needs of the entire Navahrudak district.

Solar energy revitalising Chernobyl-affected areas

In recent years, cell phone operator Velcom invested €23m in the solar power plant project in Brahindistrict. The official power capacity of the station is 22.3 MW – enough to provide evening street illumination for the entire Belarusian capital.

Velcom spokesperson Helmut Duhs presented the solar plant project in Brahin as a green business product, noting that such projects create new jobs and benefit local economies. In this manner, they help to revitalise regions that suffered from the Chernobyl catastrophe.

The company plans to cover all expenses in four to five years, as Homiel region boasts about 1,900 sunny hours per year, more than any other part of Belarus. The land is also cheaper, as the Brahin district is not suitable for agriculture because of contamination from the Chernobyl fallout.

Yet in reality, Belarus has a long way to go, especially compared to Germany, which recently made the headlines around the world when it managed to obtain 100 per cent of its energy supply from renewable sources. By contrast, the share of renewable energy production in Belarus remains marginal, at around 1 per cent.

One step forward, two steps back

The law On Renewable Energy Sources, adopted in 2010, removed the state monopoly on energy production inBelarus. This opened the door for foreign investors, who are interested in renewable energy projects.

At first, the Belarusian state encouraged them. It guaranteed purchases of green energy, offering tax incentives and special tariffs for a 10 year period to allow investors to cover their expenses. The state also ensured that the price that ordinary Belarusians pay for energy from alternative sources remained on the same level as the price of energy from traditional sources.

Yet despite financial support from the EU and opportunities to attract investment from countries other than Russia, the Belarusian bureaucracy seems to acknowledge the potential of green energy only on paper, instead of genuinely committing to long-term sustainability goals.

The Belarusian authorities often fail to win the trust of foreign investors, refusing to remove bureaucratic hurdles or endangering projects already in their implementation stage, as happened in 2012 with the planned wind park near Minsk. German company Enertrag AG terminated the project after interference from the Belarusian Ministry of Defence, which complained that it was disrupting the radar work.

By 2015, the fortunes of green energy had changed dramatically. The state had the new NPP up its sleeve and tried to reassert its monopoly in the energy sector. The government promptly interfered with the introduction of quotas for green energy, limiting opportunities for investors.

In the period of 2016-2018, Belarus set construction limits for renewable energy sources to the overall capacity of 215 MW. One argument for this is reduction of costs, as currently the state pays 41 cents for 1 kWh for energy from renewable sources, when the cost price is only 9 cents. The state is also reluctant to pay this money to foreign companies, holding on to its monopoly of theBelarusian energy market.

What's in it for consumers?

Belarusian energy consumers have a chance to become energy-independent by investing in solar panel for their houses, but this decision is a risky one as the expenses remain high. The cheapest solar panels for private use cost up to $2,600. This amount exceeds average salaries in the countryalmost eightfold.

One of the principal risks is the issue of selling the excess energy to the state. In theory, the state has encouraged this by offering preferential tariffs since 2015. Yet in practice, this offer applies only to private companies and entrepreneurs, and not to ordinary citizens.

The larger problem is the grim perspectives of green energy since the emergence of the AstraviecNPP, scheduled for launch in 2018. It is quite possible that the state might change the rules of the game once again, revoking preferences to private sellers of green energy. Thus, the unpredictability of the regime creates similar risks for Belarusian consumers as it does for foreign investors.

In the long term and under favourable conditions green energy in Belarus could contribute to the energy independence of the country, as it has the potential to generate up to 25 per cent of the overall energy supply. Ideally, it also could help ordinary Belarusians to become self-sufficient in their energy production. Yet with the first Belarusian NPP in sight and without true commitment from the state, the future of green energy projects in Belarus remains uncertain.